Hindu Kings Who Ruled Syria and Turkey!


Research paper written by London Swaminathan
Research article No.1341; Dated 11th October 2014.

Foreign “scholars” who wrote Indian history books deliberately hid some glorious chapters of Indian history — 1500 year rule of the Hindus in South East Asian countries and 2000 year rule of Hindus in Syria, Turkey and Iraq. Though the Bogazkoy inscription mentioning the Vedic Gods, Amarna letters of Dasaratha in Egypt, Kikkuli’s Horse manual with Sanskrit numbers were discovered long before Indian independence, they never found a place in our school and college text books.

The British writers who wrote our history books wrote more about their “achievements” and “developments” in India than Indian contribution and cultural expansion. But instead of blaming them now, we have to blame our “scholars” who never bothered to correct it or update it. All over the world they updated their past history saying that they had glorious civilization around 1000 BCE or 2000 BCE. Indian history has a huge gap between Mauryan dynasty and Indus Valley. The Marxist and Dravidian scholars are very happy! They never recognised any of the 153 generations mentioned by Megasthenes and the Hindu Puranas.

It is not too late to read about the glorious Hindu rule in Syria and Turkey.


Amarna letters

Between 1600 BCE and 1200 BCE the major powers of the Near East contended with each other for control of the region by means of war and diplomacy. Much of our knowledge of this period comes from the Amarna letters, a collection of clay tablets containing correspondence between Egyptian rulers of the later 18th Dynasty and their neighbours. They reveal amongst other things, the existence of Mitanni (Amarna is in Egypt).

The Amarna letters date from the reigns of Amenophis III and IV (Akhenaten) and Tutankhamun (1390—1327 BCE). Written in Akkadian, the diplomatic language of the time, in cuneiform script, they include letters from subject princes and regions in the Near East. In the letters we see rulers sending gifts to each other and sometimes entering into dynastic marriages such as that between Amenophis III and Taduhepa, daughter of Tushratta (Dasaratha) of Mitanni.

Tushratta wrote to his son in law, “ I have sent you , as a present to my brother, five chariots and five yoke of horses, and as a present to Taduhepa my sister, I have sent trinkets of gold, a pair of gold earrings ….. and godly stones”. After the death of Amenophis III, Taduhepa was married to his son Akhenaten.
Tushratta twice sent the statues of Ishtar of Nineveh to Egypt to heal the pharaoh of Egypt. (Ishtar is Goddess Durga. Foreign writers always give their known equivalents instead of original names. All the Greek writers wrote that Indians worship Bacchus and Hercules meaning Shiva/Indra and Vishnu)

Mitannian seal

Mitanni (Mitranya Desa) appears in history in 1480 BCE, when Parrattarna (Pratardhana) was in control of Aleppo in Syria , By the end of 15th century BCE, Saushatar brought Assyria under Mitannian control. Tushratta was assassinated by his son in 1340 BCE. He was the last king of independent Mitanni. His kingdom was destroyed by the Hittites and Assyrians. A document from the Hittite capital Hattusa records a treaty in which Tushratta’s son Shattiwaza is recognised as the ruler of Mitanni as a Hittite vassal. Mitanni’s capital was called Washukanni (Vedic God Vasu) .
A powerful Hurrian (Surya Vamsa; Hurrian=Suryan)) state in north Mesopotamia and Syria (named after Surya, Hindu sun god) , Mitanni is first mentioned in an Egyptian tomb inscription dating to the early the fifteenth century BCE and last attested at the time of Assyrian king Tiglath-pilesar 1115—1077 BCE.

The name Mitanni comes from a personal name maiita (MITRA for Sun) known from Nuzi In Iraq. Since Bogazkoy inscription mentioned Mitra in Mitannian Peace Treaty, there is no doubt that it denotes MITRA, the Vedic God. Hurriya is also Surya=Sun=Mitra.
Mitra, Surya, Hurya, Solomon, Suleyman, Shulman are all same (H=S)

Mitanni changed in to a geographical name Maittani. The state was also known as Hurri in Hurrian, Khanigalbat in Assyrian and some other texts, Khabigalbat in Babylonian, and Naharina or Nahrima in Egyptian.
Sanskrit word Nagara= Nagarika= City dwellers ,Cultured, Posh


Scholars could not identify or locate its capital Washukanni. Its identification with Tell Fekherieh is disputed. By the mid fifteenth century BCE, Mitanni has conquered many parts of Iraq, Turkey, Syria which stretched to the Mediterranean sea. Its kings campaigned against Egypt and Hatti and eventually signed peace treaties with them.

It has been argued that the glass production in the fifteenth century BCE should be attributed to Mitanni and the best early glass comes from Nuzi in Iraq.
After Mitannian contact with Egypt, we see lot of Sanskrit names among Egyptian royals. Tutankhamen’s wife was Ankenan. It is the corrupted form of Anjana or Angana (Surangana= Sura+ angana= Woman of Devaloka)

Mitanni Kings with pure Sanskrit Names
Kirta (1500 BCE) = Kreeta/Crown or Kirti=Fame
Shuttarna = Sudhana or Sudharsana (Gautama Buddha’s father name was Sudhodana)
Paratarna = Pratardhana in Vishnu Sahsranama
Shaushtatara = Suacadhara (Pure?)
Artatama = Like Rudra Daman(130—150 CE), Arta Daman or Arta Dharma
Shuttarna II
Artashumara = Artha Kumara
Artatama II
Shuttarna III
Shattivaza/ Kirtiwasa = Sathya vakya, Sathya Vacha, Kirti Vacha, Krittivasan is name of Lord Shiva
Shattuvara= Satvavara or Sathyavaran
Wasashatta = Vasu satva or Sathya
Shattuara II =

(Like India, grand father’s name or great grand father’s name was repeated. Pandyas alternated with Maran and Sadaiyan; Maravarman and Jadavarman)

Dasaratha Letter to Egyptian Paharoah

Hindu Migration
Vedas mention Pancha Jana (five tribes) in many places. Of the five tribes, Druhyus were the people who migrated to West Asia. Now we get lot of proof for this from the 8th Mandala of Rig Veda. The names correlate with the names in Iraq and Iran. It should have happened before 2000 BCE.
In my post “Did Indra Attack Ur in Sumeria?”, I have given enough proof for the Vedic contact with Mesopotamia (Iraq).


Old Reference:
Following is the piece posted by me under Indus Valley to Egypt: Lapiz lazuli Export:
“The contact between Egypt and the Hindu kings of Turkey and Syria is well documented. Thanks to the clay tablets of Amarna letters we know that Dasaratha’s daughter Taduhepa ( Datta shivaa) was married to Amenophis III of Egypt. Dasaratha was ruling Syria and Turkey around 1380 BCE. He was assassinated in 1340 BCE. Mitanni kings followed Vedic religion is confirmed by Bogazkoy inscription where all the four major Vedic gods are mentioned in a peace treaty. Pratardhana – name in Vishnu sahasranama – was ruling Aleppo now in Syria. Turkey and Syria were ruled by the Vedic kings from 1480 BCE according to the clay tablets.

Dasaratha sent Amenophis five chariots, five horses, trinkets of gold, a pair of gold rings and goodly stones, says one of the Amarna letters. We have more Sanskrit names and horse manual with Sanskrit numbers around 1400 BCE in Turkey. Marrying one’s daughter with a king of a neighbouring country is a typical Hindu custom followed by kings from Kanyakumari to Kashmir and beyond. Afghan Gandhari and Iranian Kaikeyi were married to Drudharashtra and Dasaratha, because all those countries were ruled by the Hindus in those days.

(Mitannian Dasaratha is different from Ramayana Dasaratha. Like Tamils, Tamilize Sanskrit words, Mitannians also wrote Dasaratha as Tushratta, Pratardhana as Parartana. Even today Sri Lankan Tamils write Damayanthy as Tamayanthy. Mauritius Tamils are still worse and they write Subramanya as Soupramoniamme due to French influence. Greek writer, Chinese visiors and British rulers distorted all place names and people’s names beyond recognition. Beautiful Aralvaymozi became Aramboli, Tarangampadi changed to Tranqbar, Tutukkudi changed to Tuticorin < Alexander became Alikasunda etc.)

The horse manual written by Kikkuli ( Aswa Sena) runs to 1080 lines on clay tablets. Though it was written in Hittite language the numerals Aika,Tera,Pancha, Satta, Nava vartaana (1,3,5,7,9 intervals) and words for colours are in Sanskrit.

Books used: Dictionary of the Near East by the British Museum, Time’s World History, Arya Tanagini by A. Kalyanaraman and Wikipedia.)

Leave a comment


  1. sam Anonymous

     /  April 15, 2018

    Very interesting post. it is ludicrous to see how so many people deny these facts when the proof is right before their eyes. I have always wondered about the great similarities between Indian culture and religion and Egyptian culture and religion. I have been reading documentation lately, concluding that the Elamites are the present day Indians , could you write a article on that if there is any truth to it?

  2. Dancing Star

     /  May 19, 2019

    Many people deny the facts mentioned in the article because they’re ‘politically incorrect’.

    Also politically incorrect (I’m not saying our ancient ancestors are responsible, they merely mixed with them):



    Obviously there is some White Indo-European admixture among some of those in the Indian sub-continent, mainly due to the conquests of the Macedonian king Alexander the Great.


    [By measuring the lengths of the segments of ANI and ASI ancestry in Indian genomes, the authors were thus able to obtain precise estimates of the age of population mixture, which they infer varied about 1,900 to 4,200 years, depending on the population analyzed.

    While the findings show that no groups in India are free of such mixture, the researchers did identify a geographic element. “Groups in the north tend to have more recent dates and southern groups have older dates,” said co-first author Priya Moorjani, a graduate student in Reich’s lab at Harvard Medical School. “This is likely because the northern groups have multiple mixtures.”

    “This genetic datatells us a three-part cultural and historical story,” said Reich, who is also an associate member of the Broad Institute. “Prior to about 4000 years ago there was no mixture. After that, widespread mixture affected almost every group in India, even the most isolated tribal groups. And finally, endogamy set in and froze everything in place.”]

    It is known that the Egyptians used brown, red and yellow ochre as an archaic form of sunscreen; though most were evidently not white.

  3. Dancing Star

     /  May 19, 2019

    I forgot to include: https://youtu.be/eiMfXZyCe9w?t=507

  4. How do one judge the direction of human race and culture movement. Based on where one stand or based on time frame

    Have seen artifacts in Middle East traditional markets which has replicas seen in India. They claim it is their traditional artifacts. Indians believe it is our traditional artifacts

    I have wondered who is correct, and still seek without judging or deciding!

  5. Veeraswami Panjan

     /  June 16, 2019

    You are right that Aryan stock are these races who ruled Turky Syria and also Iron Irag, not as Hindus but Aryans. Of-course one way you are right Aryan or Hindus are the same. This has the support as languages related to Aryans as supported by Jacobi , Pargiter, Konow, and Eduard Meyer.
    AS you know only Bristish in 1891 when on Census first time introduced the tern Hindu who are other than Muslim, Christian, Parsis etc. This proposition was applauded by the Kanchee seer also.

  6. Addi Wrki

     /  March 6, 2020


  7. Addi Wrki

     /  March 6, 2020

    This disproves the arrogant and prejudiced European viewpoint that Indians are descended from western conquerors, again the same habit of self glorifying themselves and putting down ppl foreign to them:


    Alex did not conquer any part of India and was in fact badly defeated by King Porus it’s the northwestern boundary of India; even in his own words the Indian attack was described as exceedingly fierce. Now the Greeks/romans made a bs story that alex won the battle and conquered Porus’ area but that bc his troops were tired, homesick and missing their families, they decided to retreat back to Europe; what? You really expect me to believe that after you win a battle and conquer, you’d give it up just like that and not proceed further to conquer more land in the same direction?? Has this ever happened in history?? Please… Even Marshal Zhukov, the Russian historian completely rips apart the false theory that Alex conquered and won battles at all in India, look him up; the Greeks romans and Europeans in general just wanted to save face that they were defeated and cover it up with lies. This is why for eg. the BBC of the UK is so anti Indian bc ultimately Indian nationalists kicked them out of India and they are still sore about it…

    Anyways dancing star I find your posts bigoted, prejudiced and laced with typical European ignorance. First of all, why do you assume that lighter skinned Indians are not true Indians and that only dark Indians are true Indians and indigenous to Indus Valley? Secondly, why do you liken light skinned Indians to Europeans like Alex conquering part of India and “mixing” with locals? Firstly that’s false as I’ve given examples above- the URL and Zhukov. And secondly, by the same token then you could say darker Europeans have those features by ancient indians conquering those lands as well. The Mittani kings likely mixed with locals which passed on darker features to middle eastern ppl who later conquered Europe, bringing darker features to Europe. Also the Mittani ppl themselves later settled in Middle East, which then conquered parts of Europe, so you could say then that the Indians that were related to the Mittani ppl conquered parts of Europe. Also you have to remember the Sikh empire, that originated in India, conquered as far as Afghanistan (you find Gurdwaras there from those times), and so there would be marrying with locals there and even some of them settling there and so again you would have the same Indians admixing with middle easterners which then again ruled parts of Europe. Also for eg. with these articles above, it’s also possible and likely then that these same kings and their empires may have expanded into parts of Europe as well bc the middle eastern empires did rule over Europe and conquered parts of it as well ie. Spain, which is why hispanics likely have darker features than Nordic euros. I find it interesting how Europeans will never talk about things the other way around- about middle eastern, asiatic and ancient Indian ppls and empires ruling and expanding towards Europe and essentially conquering parts of it (as I just explained above) and mixing with them, but it’s just more of the same ethnocentrism of promoting yourself and suppressing others type of mentality. You need to realize that lighter skinned Indians could be just as native to India as darker Indians. Otherwise the theory was before that a common ancestor gave rise to both Indians in the south and Europeans in the west and that perhaps darker Indians came from Australia, Polynesia, and parts of Africa. So you can’t claim native ness to a land merely by skin colour…that’s again just being prejudiced to glorify yourself. I suspect ancient Indian records held the truth but the British colonials likely destroyed all these historical records to again suppress the truth and promote themselves…

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: