In Tamil it is Kokkara Kokkara Ko
Post No. 13,890
Date uploaded in London – 15 November 2024
Contact – swami_48@yahoo.com
Pictures are taken from various sources for spreading knowledge.
this is a non- commercial blog. Thanks for your great pictures.
tamilandvedas.com, swamiindology.blogspot.com
xxxx
Part one was posted yesterday
So called linguists of the western world could not only explain the different sounds heard by the different language speakers around the world from roosters and dogs, but also the existence of 700 different languages in the New Guinea island and 250 different languages among Australian aborigines.
Since most of them don’t know my mother tongue Tamil they bluffed and bluffed about the changes in the Vedic sounds. Whatever they said about so called I.E. or I .A. canges
R=L (roma=loma)
S=T/D Sion=Tion; Vishyam=Vidayam, Bhasa Padai
J=Y (Java=Yava; Jaffna=Yazpanam)
R=L=D
M=N
V=B (Vimbam=Bimbam) etc are found in the so called Dravidian Tamil. ( I Have given more examples in my previous articles on the same subject).
In short their examples from Indo European or Indo-Aryan are incomplete and false.
The wonder of wonders is only two languages Sanskrit and Tamil follow the Sandhi rules! according to them they are two different language groups.
The Bhavad Gita and Tamil Veda Tirukkural are still written with the Sandhi/Joining rules. Only when they are explained word by word, we see them in its original form. When they join new letters appear or new letters are inserted for the sake of euphony.
Here are the Rooster and Dog noise in different languages:
cock-a-doodle-do of cocks in English; Kokkara kokkara ko in Tamil. Why?
woof of dogs in English; lol, lol, val, val in Tamil. Why?
Even if the English man listens to a Tamil dog barking, he wont say lol or val. Why?
Why every European hears different barking from the same dog?
They cant hear the sound like a Tamil. It is different in every language in the world. But the animal raises the voice in the same way. I mean the same animal in the same place. When people from different parts of the world listen to the same bird in the same location they hear it differently. Those idiots formed their own rules and laws. My research in Avestan, Greek, Latin, Sanskrit and Tamil show that Hindu linguistics is the basis. Tamil and Sanskrit formed the basis or foundations. Hindus spread the culture, language and the script throughout the ancient world.
We said Thuuththukkudi and the English man wrote Tuticorin !. When we said Thanjavoor, Thirunelveli, Thiruvananthapuram Tharangampaadi, Aaral Vaay Mozi English men wrote Tanjore, Tinnevely, Trivandrum, Transqubar, Aaraampoli.
It happened in London Heathrow Airport too; I was called to interpret for Sri Lakan refugees and the customs officers murdered or massacred Tamil names. You can see them in all the refugees’ passports even today. And the refugees were very happy because they wanted to erase their identity; they were afraid of Tamil terrorists and Sinhalese Government. Moreover most of them were economic refugees.
I used to correct answer papers of Tamil students from different parts of the Tamil speaking world. Their spellings amazed me. They really murdered Tamil by writing Murder Muthu for Maruthamuthu; all the foreign Tamils used T for D , S for J , P for B etc.
Damayanthi will be Tamayanthi
Bhuvaneswary is Puvaneswary
Rajendran is Rasendran etc.
But in some places they don’t want to change; Yoga Raja is always Yogaraja not Yoka rasa. When I asked my Sri Lankan friends hey couldn’t explain.
The same thing happened when they excavated Sanskrit names in Turkey (Bogazkoy) dated 1340 BCE, the spelling for Dasaratha was Tushratta. Then the scoundrels or rascals known as linguists said it is early form of Sanskrit and Aryans used it before they entered India!!!! Those stupid people deliberately hid the fact that is happening in London Heathrow Airport even now. Like dogs’ barking is heard differently by different Europeans, sounds change according to their culture and language. Even Panini knew it and wrote the differences in the Eastern part of India 2700 years ago. Vedic Prataisakya also understood it and allowed different pronunciation for different areas.
Even today the North Indians recite the Vedas according to their Pratisakya, very different from Soth Indian Brahmins.
And the so called scholars or half baked idiots compared Vedic Sanskrit with modern Greek. We have no record equivalent to Rig Veda in any part of the world. The other world literatures are at least 1000 years younger to Vedic Sanskrit. But they compared them without any rhyme or reason and formed new laws.
In Tamil it is Lol Lol or Val Val
Max Muller after severe attacks from Prof Wilson and others went back and said Rig Veda may be dated 1500 BCE or earlier and said no one can date the Rig Veda. Professor Wilson and others dated it 2000 BCE or earlier. In fact no linguist can apply their rules to Rig Veda because it is transmitted orally without any changes for thousands of years. And the astronomical references date it to 4000 to 6000 BCE. If it is correct, then the Harappan people should have used only Sanskrit. Because Tamil literature never mentioned Indus River or Saravati River. Tamils did not even know it or that area. But they mentioned Ganges and Himalayas in about twenty places in Sangam Tamil literature. Above all , Tamils have nothing in writing before second century BCE. Even the very short Brahmi scrips found in Tamil Nadu have no pure Tamil words. In fact Sangam Tamil literature it self has No past tense, no future tense, no present tense; very strange indeed!
Why Sa, Gna etc are banned in Tamil in initial positions? But they use Sangam for their academies; Sangam is a pure Sanskrit word found in Panini’s book
Why 12th Tamil vowel Av (Ow) is not used anywhere in ancient Tamil?
Why Tamil and Sanskrit only have the same alphabetical order and no other languages ?
(a, aa, e, ee, u, uu, ae, aeae, ai etc)
Why Persians change all S into H and why Bengalis change all V into B?
Why there is no grammar (Vyakarana) book for any language except Sanskrit 2700 years ago?
Why there is no Etymology (Nirukta) book except Sanskrit 2800 years ago?
Why there is no Pronunciation guide book (Pratisakya) except Sanskrit 3000 years ago?
Why there is no Thesaurus (Nikandu like Amarakosa) book except Sanskrit 2000 years ago?
All these show Sanskrit was a highly developed language when Greek did not even have Homer’s Iliad and Odyssey .
Why and When was the Tamil three dots (Aytha Eluthu or letter) invented and rarely used. There is no such Dotted letter in any other language ;Sanskrit use two dots for Visarga only.
Avestan language is closer to Sanskrit like Tamil. Both the languages change J into S or Z.
Native Langauges in New Guinea
Both the languages hate Sa. Tamil grammar banned Sa in initial positions. Avestan has no Sa at all. If one says Sindhu they write Hindu! Why?
The answer for all the WHY questions is that they hear the sound in that way like today’s Europeans hear the barking of dogs.
Sanskrit is the only ancient language in the world which can reproduce 90 to 95 percent of the sounds of all other languages. Tamil can’t do that.
(Try to write or pronounce in Tamil Rajendra, July, Joseph, Stalin Shakespeare, Harry Potter , Harsha, Jayabalan)
Here are some barks from different languages
§ English – woof, woof; ruff, ruff; arf, arf (large dogs and also the sound of sea lions); yap, yap; yip, yip (small dogs), bow wow
§ Afrikaans – blaf, blaf; woef, woef; keff, keff (small dogs)
§ Albanian – ham, ham
§ Arabic – hau, hau; how how (هو ,هو)
§ Armenian -haf, haf
§ Basque – au, au; txau, txau (small dogs); zaunk, zaunk (large dogs); jau, jau (old dogs)
§ Balinese – kong, kong
§ Bengali – gheu, gheu; bhao, bhao
§ Bulgarian – bau-bau (бау-бау); jaff, jaff (джаф-джаф)
§ Brazilian Portuguese – au au
§ Burmese – woke, woke
§ Catalan – bau, bau; bub, bub
§ Chinese, Cantonese – wow, wow (汪汪)
§ Chinese, Mandarin – wang, wang
§ Croatian – vau, vau
§ Czech – haf, haf; štěk (the bark itself)
§ Danish – vov, vuf
§ Dutch – waf, waf; woef, woef
§ Esperanto – boj, boj
§ Estonian – auh, auh
§ Finnish – hau, hau; vuh, vuh; rauf, rauf
§ French – waouh, waouh; ouahn, ouahn; vaf, vaf; wouf, wouf; wouaf, wouaf; jappe jappe
§ German – wuff, wuff; wau, wau; rawrau, rawrau
§ Greek – ghav, ghav (γαβ, γαβ)
§ Hebrew – hav, hav; hau, hau
§ Hindi – bow, bow
§ Hungarian – vau, vau
§ Icelandic – voff, voff
§ Indonesian – guk, guk
§ Irish – amh, amh
§ Italian – bau, bau
§ Japanese – wan-wan (ワンワン); kyan-kyan (キャンキャン)
§ Korean – meong, meong (멍멍, pronounced [mʌŋmʌŋ])
§ Latvian – vau, vau
§ Lithuanian – au, au
§ Macedonian – av, av
§ Malay – gong, gong (“menggonggong” means barking)
§ Marathi – bhu, bhu; bho, bho
§ Norwegian – voff, voff or boff
§ Persian – vogh, vogh
§ Polish – hau, hau
§ Portuguese – au, au; ão-ão (nasal diphthong); béu-béu (toddler language); cain-cain (whining)
§ Romanian – ham, ham; hau, hau
§ Russian – gav, gav (гав-гав); tyav, tyav (тяв-тяв, small dogs)
§ Serbian – av, av
§ Sinhala – සිංහල – buh, buh
§ Slovak – haf, haf; hau, hau
§ Slovene – hov, hov
§ Spanish – guau-guau; gua, gua; jau, jau
§ Swedish – voff, voff; vov, vov; bjäbb, bjäbb
§ Tagalog – aw, aw; baw, baw
§ Tamil – wal wal
§ Thai – โฮ่ง โฮ่ง (pronounced [hôŋhôŋ]); บ๊อก บ๊อก (pronounced [bɔ́kbɔ́k])
§ Turkish – hev hev; hav, hav
§ Ukrainian – гав, гав (hau, hau); дзяв, дзяв (dzyau, dzyau)
§ Urdu – bow bow
§ Vietnamese – gâu gâu; ẳng ẳng
§ Welsh – wff, wff
Native Languages in Australia
—subham—-
Tags – Western Linguists , Frauds, Part- 2, Rooster, Dogs, crowing, barking, changes in , Tamil, Avestan, Indo European, Indo Aryan, Dravidian, Australia, Aborigines, New Guinea, Languages
Tamil and Vedas 