Post No. 8023
Date uploaded in London – 22 May 2020
Contact – swami_48@yahoo.com
Pictures are taken from various sources for spreading knowledge; this is a non- commercial blog. Thanks for your great pictures.
PS S SUBRAHMANYA SASTRI’S LECTURE CONTINUED FROM YESTERDAY.
BRIEFLY………………….
PAGES 10 AND 11 – BISHOP ROBERT CALDWELL IS WRONG ABOUT CONVERTIBILITY OF SURDS, BORRWING OF CEREBRALS .
PAGE 12 – HOW TAMIL CHANGES IN THE USE OF ‘VIYANGOL VINAI’
PAGE 13 – HOE ‘YAAN’ BECAME ‘NAAN’ IN APPAR TEVAARAM
MY COMMENTS – UP TO TIRUVALLUVAR PERIOD YOU CANT SEE ‘NAAN’ FOR ‘I.’ ONLY ‘YAAN’ WAS USED FOR ‘I’
PAGE 14- HOW ‘KAL’ SUFFIX FOR PLURAL CHANGED IN USE.
PAGE 15- HOW ‘NAATRAM’ CHANGED IN MEANING; ORIGINALLY SMELL, BUT NOW BAD SMELL
HOW ‘SEYYUM’ IN FUTURE TENSE CHANGED
PAGE 16- EXPLAINS AGGLUTINATIVE, ISOLATING AND INFLEXIONAL LANGUAGES
PAGE 18- WHAT IS GENEOLOGICAL RELATIONSHIP? EXPLAINED
PAGE 20 – USE OF CASE SUFFIXES IN TAMIL AND SANSKRIT
PAGE 21 – TAMIL USES GENDER DISCRIMINATING ELEMENTS; SANSKRIT DOE’ S NOT; EXAMPLES………………….
VANTHAAN – HE CAME
VANTHAAL – SHE CAME
VANTHAAR – BOTH SEX; RESPECTFUL
VANTHATHU – SINGULAR NEUTER
VANTHANA – NETER PLURAL …….. IN TAMIL
PAGE 22- VERBAL SYSTEM IN SANSKRIT IS COMPLICATED- TAMIL SIMPLE.
PAGE 22 AND 23 NEGATIVE VOICE
tags –Caldwell wrong, P S S Sastri-2, Tamil-Sanskrit- 2
to be continued………………………………
Tamil and Vedas 