Post No. 8041
Date uploaded in London – 25 May 2020
Contact – swami_48@yahoo.com
Pictures are taken from various sources for spreading knowledge; this is a non- commercial blog. Thanks for your great pictures.
P S Subrahmnya Sastri continues his comparison of Tolkappiam with Sanskrit scriptures
Page 43 – 47 Bishop Caldwell’s criticism against Tamils is wrong says Sastri. He exposes Caldwell’s confusion regarding case suffix in Tolkappiam and Nannul
Page 48- 49Tolkappian followed Nirukta of Yaska
Page 50- 51 Tolkappiar followed Rig Veda in the use of Uru; in page 51 Sastri shows again how Yaska’s Nirukta is followed
51-52 case suffixes in Tolkappiam and Paniniyam are compared
Page 52-53 Tokai of Tol. And Samasam of Sanskrit are same.
PORUL ATIKAARAM – SCIENCE OF POETICS IN TOLKAPPIAM
Now Sastri moves to the last section of Tol.
Pages 53 – 56 Tol. Followed Natya Sastra of Bharata in eight Rasas and other things
Pages 56-57 Similarities between Tol and Artha sastra of Kautilya
Pages 58-59 Similarities between Dharma Sastras (Manu, Gautama ) and Tol. In describing eight types of marriages.
And in Sutra Tol. Used Dharma, Artha, Kama etc.
Please see attached pages for references.
tags – Tamil-Sanskrit-5, Relationship, more Caldwell blunders,
To be continued ………………….
Tamil and Vedas 