MORE BLUNDERS OF BISHOP CALDWELL, TAMIL -SANSKRIT RELATIONSHIP – PART 5 (Post No.8041)

WRITTEN BY LONDON SWAMINATHAN

Post No. 8041

Date uploaded in London – 25 May 2020   

Contact – swami_48@yahoo.com

Pictures are taken from various sources for spreading knowledge; this is a non- commercial blog. Thanks for your great pictures.

P S Subrahmnya Sastri continues his comparison of Tolkappiam with Sanskrit scriptures

Page 43 – 47 Bishop Caldwell’s criticism against Tamils is wrong says Sastri. He exposes Caldwell’s confusion regarding case suffix in Tolkappiam and Nannul

Page 48- 49Tolkappian followed Nirukta of Yaska

Page 50- 51 Tolkappiar followed Rig Veda in the use of Uru; in page 51 Sastri shows again how Yaska’s Nirukta is followed

51-52 case suffixes in Tolkappiam and Paniniyam are compared

Page 52-53 Tokai of Tol. And Samasam of Sanskrit are same.

PORUL ATIKAARAM – SCIENCE OF POETICS IN TOLKAPPIAM

Now Sastri moves to the last section of Tol.

Pages 53 – 56 Tol. Followed Natya Sastra of Bharata in eight Rasas and other things

Pages 56-57 Similarities between Tol and Artha sastra of Kautilya

Pages 58-59 Similarities between Dharma Sastras (Manu, Gautama ) and Tol. In describing eight types of marriages.

And in Sutra Tol. Used Dharma, Artha, Kama etc.

Please see attached  pages for references.











tags – Tamil-Sanskrit-5, Relationship, more Caldwell blunders, 

To be continued ………………….

Leave a comment

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out /  Change )

Google photo

You are commenting using your Google account. Log Out /  Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out /  Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out /  Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: