RECITE STORY OF SUNASHEPA: YOU WILL GET GOLDEN CARPET AND SILVER CHARIOT! (Post No.4256)

 

Written by London Swaminathan

 

Date: 29 September 2017

 

Time uploaded in London- 15-56

 

 

Post No. 4256

 

Pictures are taken from various sources such as google, Facebook friends, newspapers and Wikipedia for non-commercial use; thanks.

 

RECITE STORY OF SUNASHEPA: YOU WILL GET GOLDEN CARPET AND SILVER CHARIOT! (Post No.4256)

Rig Vedic society was well advanced and highly civilized. They were an economic super power in the ancient world. Every prize is given only in big decimal numbers such as 10,000 or 100,000 and  gold is freely distributed as dakshina (fees for the priests). Half baked, white skinned “scholars” and their Marxist sycophants described the Rig Vedic Hindus as nomads, pastoral, silly, ridiculous, childish, gibberish, obscure etc. But the biggest wonder is there were 179 different jobs they were doing. One of them is Nakshatra Darshak (Star gazer= astronomer); Jyotish is different. It dealt with auspicious time and the 27+1 stars. India was the oldest civilization to teach jyotisha (astrology) as part of Veda Patasala syllabus. The Vedic youths must study six more subjects such as grammar, linguistics, astrology along with the Vedas. These 179 jobs are in Yajur Veda. White skinned scholars never give the list of 179 professions such as doctors engineers in the Vedic society but they always add one line “victim of Purushameda Yajna’ when such words occur. What is it?

 

Purushameda Yajna was sacrificing human beings and they should throw 179 different people into fire. The foreign scholars were very happy to read such passages in the Satapata Brahmana (of Yajur veda) Even Arya Samajists disowned the Brahmana literature saying that they were not part of the Vedas. They did it because of the bad atmosphere created by the Christian preachers.

The Brahmana literature was a huge mass with full of mysteries. The language is a secret language. Neither Tamil, Greek nor Latin had any literature. If anyone reads it, it wouldn’t make any sense. But the subjects it covers is very vast from astronomy to Zoology. At first the foreigners wrote Hinduism won’t survive even for 100 years with such materials. But those foreigners never said what professions existed at the Vedic period. If they give the full list everybody would know that they were highly civilized. Hindus describe even God as doctor and his advice as medicine ( In Rudram of Yajur Veda).

 

The fact of the matter is that nobody has any proof for Purushameda Yajna (Human Sacrifice). The only anecdote is Sunashepa Anecdote. The brief account is as follows:-

 

It is from the Aitareya Brahmana: King Harischandra of the race of Ikshwaku, being childless, made a vow that if he obtained a son he would sacrifice him to Varuna. A son was born who was named Rohita, but his father postponed, under various pretexts, the fulfilment of his vow (sacrificing children is in every religious book all around globe; thousands of mysterious children’s graves are in Bahrain; read my article about Mysteries of Bahrain).

 

When he was ready to perform the sacrifice, Rohita refused to be the victim and he ran into the forest. He lived there for six years. He then met a poor Brahmin Rishi Ajigerta, who had three sons. He gave his second son Sunashepa (meaning Dog’s tail)  for an exchange of 100 cows. Sunashsepa was tied to a pole. Viswamitra was passing that way and found Sunashepa and released him. He thought it was barbaric to sacrifice a human being. Ramayana and Mahabharata gave different versions where Viswamitra’s two divine mantras released Sunashepa. He was adopted as a son by Viswamitra and changed his name as Devavarta.

A series of seven hymns in the Rig Veda is attributed to Sunashepa.

 

This clearly shows that there was no such human sacrifice nor any custom before Harischandra, one of the long list of kings. Vedic literature was very huge and most of them came before Greeks started writing.

 

Foreigners thought they could use it against Hinduism; but they couldn’t because there was no sacrifice even in this episode.

 

But on the contrary Hindus, particularly Brahmins, used it in a positive way. This is the longest and most interesting story in Aitareya Brahmana. The mere telling of the story saves one from sin.

 

“If a sinful king has the story of Sunashepa told him, not the slightest trace of sin and its consequences will remain in him. He must therefore give a 1000 cows to the teller of this story and a 100 to him who makes the responses required; and to each of them the gold embroidered carpet on which he was sitting; to the priest, besides a silver decked carriage drawn by mules. Those who wish for children should also have this story told them; then they certainly will be blessed with children”.

 

Foreign “scholars” looked like idiots when this is known to the world. Golden carpet! Silver decked chariot! to the priests for telling a story!! How wealthy they must be! Before the Sumerians did the Tulabharam (weight equal to one’s body weight) of gold was given by the Hindus! Tamil King Cheran Senguttuvan gave 55 kilos of gold to a Brahmin just for advising him to do Vedic yajnas and stop killing people in the wars! It happened 2000 years ago in Tamil Nadu.

 

Now you can laugh very loudly when you read some silly things about Vedic Hindus written by Marxist idiots and white skinned fools.

 

–Subham–

 

Leave a comment

1 Comment

  1. I am so happy to note the systematic way you are busting the myth of Max Muller and his ilk.There was a time when many Indian pundits themselves believed in the Aryan theory, taking some pride in it, forgetting the original meaning of the word. They admired Max Muller without having read a word of his work, without having ever understood his motive and secret agenda. I have even heard some Upanyasakas call Max Muller “moksha moolar”!

    N.S,Rajaram has given an instance about Max Muller, showing his Sanskrit knowledge. It seems a learned man from Calcutta once went to pay his respects to Max Muller. As soon as he entered the room, he started addressing the ‘scholar’ in chaste Sanskrit. Max Muller was nonplussed, could not follow a word of what was said, and asked his assistant in what language the strange gentleman was speaking! This is the level of his knowledge or understanding of spoken Sanskrit. And he dared to translate our “Shruti”!

    But Max Muller’s knowledge of Sanskrit was suspect and not accepted by his peers in Germany. That is why he could not get employment there.

    But to me it appears that the root cause of the distortion about the Veda lies with us. The orthodox circles rely on the commentary of Sayanacharya, who lived in the 14th Century. It is strange that a commentary could be written on the Veda, which is held to be very ancient, only in the 14th century, by which time many Vedic concepts and practices had gone out of usage! Sayanacharya interpreted the Veda as purely a system of ritual. He assigned arbitrary meanings to words, and was not consistent even in this. No wonder that those Indian pundits who were supplying Max Muller material for the book misled him. The bad scholarship of Indian pundits ( lack of experiential knowledge ) and the prejudice and hidden agenda of Max Muller combined to do the damage. Later, Marxist loonies joined their ranks.
    It is only Sri Aurobindo who attempted to unravel the mystery of the Veda. This he could do only on the basis of his Yogic experience. He has explained some mysteries and answered some riddles in the two books ” Secret of the Veda” and “Hymns to The Mystic Fire”. It is unfortunate that our orthodox circles ignore his writings, while the so called educated Indian public is unaware of, and not much interested in, the writings of Sri Aurobindo on the subject. For our educated class, the sun still rises in the West!
    But one thing which has baffled me is, how Swami Vivekananda could not see through Max Muller!.

Leave a Reply

Please log in using one of these methods to post your comment:

WordPress.com Logo

You are commenting using your WordPress.com account. Log Out / Change )

Twitter picture

You are commenting using your Twitter account. Log Out / Change )

Facebook photo

You are commenting using your Facebook account. Log Out / Change )

Google+ photo

You are commenting using your Google+ account. Log Out / Change )

Connecting to %s

%d bloggers like this: