Linguistics shows the Hindu Migratory Route ! (Post No.10,644)

DASARATHA (TUSHRATTA) LETTERS IN EGYPT

WRITTEN BY LONDON SWAMINATHAN

Post No. 10,644

Date uploaded in London – –    9 FEBRUARY   2022         

Contact – swami_48@yahoo.com

Pictures are taken from various sources for spreading knowledge.

this is a non- commercial blog. Thanks for your great pictures.

tamilandvedas.com, swamiindology.blogspot.com

Linguistics show that Sanskrit is the oldest language in the world. It also shows the way Hindus migrated to different parts of the world from India.

India has two ancient languages used until today. One is Sanskrit and the other is Tamil. No one in India can speak without a Sanskrit word. I repeat, no Tamil can speak for five minutes without a Sanskrit word. If you look at Tamil dictionaries, there are more Sanskrit words than Tamil. It is same with all major languages in India.

Let us look at the migratory route of words.

For Tamil we have literary proof from first century BCE and inscriptions from second century BCE. But the early inscriptions use Brahmi script and more Prakrit words and less Tamil words, mostly ungrammatical, fragmentary pieces. But a century earlier we see long Prakrit sentences in Asokan inscriptions. So we know the path of migration. It came from North and went up to the far south in Sri Lanka.

Sanskrit words have archaeological evidence from 1400 BCE or earlier. Kassite civilization is called Kasi, Kashi in Sumerian inscriptions. More over we find the word ‘Suryas’ around 1800 BCE.

But the indisputable proof comes from Mitanni (MITRA) civilization’s cuneiform inscriptions, Dasaratha letters (Amarna letters in Egypt) and Kikkuli’s Horse manual, all dated around 1400 BCE. The cuneiform inscription shows the Vedic Gods in the same order as we see in one hymn of the Rig Veda. It is found in Bogazkoi in modern Turkey.

Though all these facts are known round 1930s, all the scholars assumed that a group while coming to India might have stayed in Turkey. No body disputed Aryan migration theory proposed by Max Muller gangs at that time. Though it was proposed earlier as well, Max Muller and Marxists wrote voluminous literature to spread this falsehood. All English educated scholars stuck to this line to get name or credit from the British.

Linguistics help us to find out who is older and who is younger in languages and who went from where.

Tamil is the first proof

We see amazing and uniform changes in certain letters.

B=V

R=L

D=L

Persian and Greek have no ‘S’. So they changed everything with S and replaced H. We know the most famous example Sindhu= Hindu and Asva=Asba

Tamils are also banned to use S in the initial position. Like Greeks and Persians, Tamils also changed all ‘S’ words with vowels.

For instance, the Rig Vedic word Sabha is used with vowel A. Sabhai= Avai in 2000 year old Sangam Tamil Literature.

Sa = A

Bha = Vai

Who asked them to change this way?

xxx

There comes another wonder!

The original B in Sabha is changed to V.

Now we know that this V=B change is also universal.

Asva in Rig Veda becomes ASB in Persian

But which is older B or V?

Tamil literature showed us that B is original.

But one may argue against this, because even today Bengalis change all V in to B

‘V’angam is changed to ‘B’enga(l)

‘V’andhyopadhyaya is changed into ‘B’andhyo…….

It shows that the changes can happen either way….

V=B or B=V

But who guided them from Iran to Bangladesh to follow this rule?

Asb for Asva in Iranian Avesta and Bangladesh for Vangadesam in Tamil Nadu

The changes are seen in a vast area even before 2000 years.

xxx

R= L change is also universal.

This is natural; no linguistics is required. If you look at your child’s lisping, prattle you will know.

Potato cRisp is pronounced as cLisp.

xxxx

But we will take the Numerals to find out who is the oldest.

ONE to TEN in different languages.

‘Eka’ is one in Sanskrit and modern Hindi as well. We have continuity from the Rig Veda to this day.

This shows Eka , Ek is original and there was no break for several thousand years in Indus- Gangetic plain.

xxxx

AVESTAN numerals

Avestan is considered one of the world’s oldest languages. Now we have only Zoroastrian scriptures in it. Later it influenced Pahlavi, Persian, Pashto, Darik etc.

Look at the Avestan Numerals

Though Avestan is listed as an extinct language, modern research shows that there are more Sanskrit words, (see my Hindu Gods in Zend Avesta) in it.

Aivas – 1, (eka in Sanskrit)

Duva – 2, (dvau in Sanskrit )

Traayas – 3 , (trayas in Sanskrit)

Catvaaras – 4, (catvaaras in Sanskrit)

Panca – 5, (panca in Sanskrit )

Xivaas – 6, (sat in Sanskrit)

Hapta – 7, (sapta in Sanskrit )

Ashtaa – 8, (astau in Sanskrit )

Nava – 9, (nava in Sanskrit)

Dasa – 10, (dasa in Sanskrit )

Number 1 is ONDRU OR ONNU in Tamil and ONE in English ; EINS in German

We know for sure German, Tamil, English came later. Avestan also has Aivas, similar to Ains in German which slowly changed into ONE in Tamil and English.

But Sanskrit Eka is the oldest. Where is the proof?

It is in the Rig Veda which even Max Muller said older than 1500 BCE. Others dated it up to 6000 BCE.

Let us forget their dating and go to archaeological proof-

Kikkuli’s horse manual in Tukey has the following Sanskrit numerals:-

Kikkuli wrote a manual of horsemanship in HITTITE  in which he incorporated technical terms , for the length of a race  as measured in ‘turns’ of the race course, that are unmistakably Sanskrit

Eka- vartanna – one lap

Tera vartanna – three lap

Panza vartanna – five lap

Satta vartanna – seven lap

Nava vartanna – nine lap

It is dated around 1400 BCE.

If one looks at this, Vedic Gods in the Mithranni/ Mitanni agreement, Dasaratha’s (Tushrtatta)  letters in Egypt (Amarna letters) and the Rig Vedic hymn, no one would have any doubt about the presence of Sanskrit from Iran and Egypt to the Gangetic plains in India before 1400 BCE. Ganga, Sindhu, Yamuna and Sarasvati are listed in the Rig Veda. It covered vast areas in Africa and Asia!!!!

Along with this we must take into consideration of Hindu Gods and Hindu words in the Zend Avesta. Even the rebel, Manu’s son Nabhanethishta, who revolted against his father Manu, is referred to in the Zend Avesta.

Now we know Eka went out of India to become Aisva, Ains (as in Albert Ein Stein = One Stone), One in Tamil and English.

I have already written that the sound “J “existed in only one language ,SANSKRIT, in the world and it slowly migrated to West Asia to give words like Jew, Jesus, Jehovah, Joseph, Jerusalem etc. The original pronunciation is Y and not J. But J as in Jaya existed in India only and the Vedic pronunciation guide (Pratisakhya) says it becomes Y.

Hindus have the oldest Grammar Book- Panini’s Ashtadhyayi.

Hindus have the oldest etymology book- Yaska’s Nirukta

Hindus have the oldest Pronunciation Guide- Vedic Pratisakhya

Hindus have the oldest Index- Vedic Anukramani

Hindus have the oldest Thesaurus- Amara Kosa

Hindus have the oldest Sex Manual- Kama sutra

If one looks with this in background one can easily say who is the first one and who is the last one!

LINGUISTIC THEORIES SHATTERED! (Post No.8319) – Tamil …

https://tamilandvedas.com › 2020/07/10 › j-mystery-sol…

10 Jul 2020 — tamilandvedas.com, swamiindology.blogspot.com. “J” – MYSTERY SOLVED; LINGUISTIC THEORIES SHATTERED! English language had only 23 +1 letters …



Origin of J | Tamil and Vedas

https://tamilandvedas.com › tag › origin-of-j

7 Mar 2015 — Written by London swaminathan. Article No 1697; Dated 7 th march 2015. London Time 14-08. The history of letter ‘J‘ is mysterious.

—subham—

tags-  Eka, Ein, One, Avestan, Sanskrit, Tamil, Numbers, Numerals, Migration, Oldest langauge, Linguistics

Hindus Migrate to Europe 8000 Years Ago! (Post No.3708)

Written by London swaminathan

 

Date: 9 March 2017

 

Time uploaded in London:- 20-08

 

Post No. 3708

 

Pictures are taken from various sources; thanks.

 

contact; swami_48@yahoo.com

 

 

Nicholas Kazanas, a scholar from Athens has given amazing details about Hindus in his latest book “VEDIC AND INDO EUROPEAN STUDIES”. It is written for scholars with lot of linguistic studies and a layman can’t follow it easily. But he himself summarised beautifully well in the introduction. I will give only interesting points from the intro and the contents of the book.

 

Migration

AIT (Aryan Invasion/Immigration Theory) is wrong. On the contrary Hindus went into Europe 8000 years ago. He quoted the following:

Genetics also has in the 2000 decade established beyond any doubt the fact that genes flowed into Europe from N W India (Gujarat, Rajsathan, Sindh); these are the R1a 1a and the M458 and they travelled north westward before 8000 years ago (see underhill 2010)

Emeneau’s Ignorance

M B Emeneau wrote in 1954 : “At some time in the second millennium BC a band or bands of an Indo European language, later to be called Sanskrit, entered India over the North West passes. This is our linguistic doctrine which has been held now for more than a century and a half. There seems to be no reason to distrust the arguments for it, in spite of the traditional Hindu ignorance of any such invasion”.

Nicholas, in his book says: “However it is Emeneau himself who suffers from ignorance, not the Hindu tradition. For only 12 years later, in 1966, an article by the eminent archealogist George Dale in the Scientific American showed beyond any doubt that there has been no invasion, no bloodshed, no conquest, no violence. Note, too, that Emeneau talks of a doctrine and arguments and not of data, evidence and facts. Now where as historians like A L Basham accepted it readily (1975), it took Western and many Indian Sanskritists to accept this fact and change the theory into one of peaceful immigration.

 

Date of Rig Veda 3500 BCE!

All modern texts on Sanskrit and ancient Indian literature refer to the chronological scheme set out by Max Muller in his History of Sanskrit Literature (1859). What they don’t say is how he arrived at this’

 

This scheme was based on a ghost story in Katha sarit sagara (composed in 1100 CE) which mentions a certain Katyayana. This person was identified by Muller with the sutra writer Kaatyaayana, placed in the third century BCE. Thus working from that date as his basis, he set up the following chronological scheme:

Chandas (RV) – 1200-1000 BCE

Mantras (Atharva, Yajus) – 1000-800 BCE

Brahmanas, Upanishads – 800-600 BCE

Sutras etc. – down to 200 BCE

 

This chronology came into criticism at that time ( by Goldstrucker, Whitney, Winternitz and others) and even Muller admitted that nobody could determine the dates of the Rig Vedic hymns which could be from 1500, 2000 or even 5000 BCE. But his earlier scheme stuck and is being taught today in all Western Universities and most Indian ones.

However, all archaeologists today, experts in the area of Saptasindhu (Allchin, Kenoyer, Poschel, Shaffer and many others), emphasize the unbroken continuity of the native culture from c.7000 to 600 BCE, when the Persians began to invade the region.

The Indo- Aryans are indigenous to Seven River region (Sapta Sindhu) what is today North West Pakistan and North West India, since there is no evidence for any intrusion into that area before 600 BCE. The Rig Veda was complete but for minor passages by 3100 BCE when the Harappan culture begins to arise

 

Consequently, I take it that Rig Veda was composed in the 4th millennium BCE at least, the Brahmanas and the Upanishads early in the 3rd and some of the Sutra texts 2500 BCE.

 

Egypt, Babylonia learnt Maths from India!

 

Of great significance are two articles by American historian of science A.Seidenberg wherein he argues that Egyptian, Babylonian and Greek mathematics derive from the Indic Sulbasutras of Apastamba and Baudhayana or a work like that, dated c 2000 BC as lower limit, thus furnishing totally independent evidence; in these he took account of the work of Neugebauer, Cantor et all. Seidenberg wrote of this original work: its mathematics was very much like what we see in the Sulabasutras. In the first place, it was associated with the ritual. Second, there was no dichotomy between number and magnitude. In geometry, it knew the Theorem of Pythagoras and how to convert a rectangle into a square. It knew the isosceles trapezoid and how to compute its area.

(Source: Vedic and Indo-European Studies by Nicholas Kazanas, Aditya Prakashan, New Delhi, year 2015)

 

—to be continued………………………